MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7821
MotherboardMSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 18:34
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 557
63% 492 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Very good
Lighting 92.3
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 78.3
75% 87 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 71.9
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 275 279 277 281 294 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 214
Mixed 145
SusWrite 279
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 23.5
74% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 107
98% 144 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
783GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 148 148 149 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 181
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 148
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 109%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-22Z5HB0 2TB
325GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.9 9.3 7.5 7.4 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 58.2
Write 67.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 8.5
58% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
WDC WD50 00AAKX-08U6AA0 500GB
30GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
Read 41
Write 39.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 40.1
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
141GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 50.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 55.3
66% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 32%
WD My Book 1140 1TB
80GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 98 96 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 96.6
136% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) Builds (Compare 1,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) - $152

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback