Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 00:58
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$111
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 115
2-Core 200
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 609
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 110
Parallax 99.3
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 96.9
79% 96.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 582 262 262 262 261 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 1,212
Mixed 574
SusWrite 315
220% 999 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 44.9
168% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 500
381% 519 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 170%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
506GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 183 183 187 184 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 147
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 182
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
117GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 58.5
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 65
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 6R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 13% 135 325 259 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0B65 S24D390
History: Score 42: 5R 4G 5B | Score 51: 6R 5G 6B | Score 53: 6R 6G 5B
Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback