Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 153
54% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 289
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2.9
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 266 310 296 261 263 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 284
Write 102
Mixed 205
SusWrite 275
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 25.8
92% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 123%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 32GB
29GB free, PID 5599
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.9 6.3 6.7 5.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Read 23
Write 6.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6.3
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
133% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback