ECT One PietSmiet Penetrator

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT One PietSmiet Penetrator  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 20:57
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 773
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 11.6
40% 40.3 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 44.9
23% 25.6 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$125
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 327 223 245 268 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 349
Write 337
Mixed 199
SusWrite 261
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 22.2
78% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 242
209% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 121%
WD Game Drive 2TB
710GB free
Firmware: 1003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 319 320 312 351 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 274
Write 314
Mixed 290
SusWrite 329
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 21.2
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 164
120% 155 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 155 150 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 163
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 156
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 9R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 19% 97 310 243 165 27" 2560 1440 AUS27B6 ROG PG278QE
History: Score 56: 6R 6G 8B | Score 64: 9R 5G 4B
Typical One PietSmiet Penetrator Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: ECT One PietSmiet Penetrator

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback