Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 10:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 203
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 296
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.4
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.18.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 421 431 436 437 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 465
Write 418
Mixed 353
SusWrite 429
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 22.9
116% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 30.8
68% 137 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown E 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 30.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 17" 1280 720 PHLC012 Philips 190C
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback