Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 05:50
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 97.8
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 214
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 125 101 126 112 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 371
Write 316
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 121
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 13.5
51% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 61.3
102% 198 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 93%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
30GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 44.1
Write 45
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 45
56% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FDD2 04CB AO1P24HC8T1-B2NS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 8.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 7R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 19% 88 37 23 60 15.5" 1920 1080 CMN15D2
History: Score 37: 3R 6G 4B | Score 30: 3R 4G 3B | Score 53: 7R 4G 6B
Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback