Today's hottest deals

ECS A740GM-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS A740GM-M  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100507
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 39.8
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 65.3
29% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 142
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 1GB
CLim: 969 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 29.3
21% 29.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 20.8
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 37 80 74 88 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 96.4
Write 78.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 72.8
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
150GB free, PID 3312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 23.4
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 21.9
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 74%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
3GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.8 6.5 6.8 7.2 6.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.1
Write 7
SusWrite 6.5
13% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 20.1" 1280 720 ACRAD64 AL2016W
Typical A740GM-M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: ECS A740GM-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback