PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331-8 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK CM6731_CM6431_CM6331 |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120912 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '21 at 17:22 |
Run Duration | 723 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 23 36 21 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.3 2.7 MB/s
|
5.42%
Terrible
|
|||
SAMSUNG HM321HX 320GB
112GB free, PID 1f03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
621GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HM321HX 320GB
3GB free, PID 1f03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
160GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 13 13 14 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 06C1 SLZ302G08-GGNHC 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6% | 2% | 122 | 300 | 224 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D32 C27F390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples | 26x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples | 36x |
GeForce 505NvidiaBench 1%, 154 samples | 11x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $88 |