MSI MS-17F2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-17F2  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime36.9 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 18:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 757
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1283) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 64
Parallax 52.4
50% 59.3 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 50.4
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1274 993 994 989 670 692 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,546
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,422
SusWrite 935
313% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.6
210% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 918
682% 907 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 224%
Great: 264%
silicon-power 2GB
1GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 6
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 6.5
10% 9.02 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F2 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback