Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 216%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 332
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,230
111% 935 Pts
64-Core 2,265
140% 2,265 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 291
Parallax 334
254% 312 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 248
Splatting 185
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
592GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1535 827 609 602 550 603 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 1788
Mixed 1,397
SusWrite 788
313% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 84.7
302% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1347
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,237
925% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 260%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 197 197 196 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 194
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 100%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 93.3
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 107
127% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
171GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 112
Write 88.2
Mixed 72
SusWrite 104
125% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 2TB
70GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 38.9
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 44%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
38GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 146 78 107 69 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
53GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 104 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 66
Write 78
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 106
109% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 43.3
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 40.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 19% 26 110 7 120 27" 2560 1440 ACR071C XB273K GP
Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback