PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 31 '21 at 14:01 |
Run Duration | 253 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 56% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
45GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 92 26 50 23 24 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 92 90 66 105 121 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS7250SASUN500G 0650KW57NF 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: K2AOAV0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60% | 39% | 61 | 282 | 178 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | ACR0497 KA220HQ |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 653x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 205x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 170x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 129x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 114x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 111x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $512 |