Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 903
86% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,358
84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 562 526 501 479 456 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2662
Write 729
Mixed 1,250
SusWrite 532
283% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 79.6
277% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1128
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 1,008
743% 984 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 268%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 460 453 468 462 464 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 488
Mixed 405
SusWrite 458
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 54.4
192% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
42GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 211 155 154 155 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 326
SusWrite 196
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 47.1
176% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 148
169% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
663GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 144 144 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 157
Write 136
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 144
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
824GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 117 116 122 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 103
Write 110
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 120
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
168% Outstanding
MC Read 67.5
MC Write 73.1
MC Mixed 62.2
193% 67.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 25.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 168%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 0" 1280 720
Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback