Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S1  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 09:49
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1820-$56
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 107
41% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 126
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.7
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 205 301 214 83 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 308
Write 293
Mixed 231
SusWrite 187
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 19.6
68% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 70.2
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 109
90% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
365GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 138 178 173 154 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 152
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 162
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 206
20% 206 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 27 5 3 0 15.5" 1366 768 GSM3E92 LG HD 16
Typical GA-H81M-S1 Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback