Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 03:16
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 138
56% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 588
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 2,411
149% 2,411 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 296
Parallax 335
207% 295 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 252
Splatting 188
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 185%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI960G17AI178 960GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.4 3.5 1.6 69 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 442
Write 371
Mixed 335
SusWrite 72.6
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 15.4
76% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 0.3
56% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 157 166 169 168 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 131
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 166
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
119GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 31.2
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 37.8
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
140% Outstanding
MC Read 79.7
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 52.3
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 200 29.5" 1280 720 LHC3000 X300
Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback