Asus P7P55D PREMIUM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D PREMIUM  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121003
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '21 at 19:17
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 134
61% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 256
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 33
Parallax 31.8
26% 32.4 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.7
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 0 0 0 0 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
557GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 164
Write 108
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 74
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 109%
UFD USB Flash Drive 1GB
0GB free, PID a740
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 4.1
8% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM598E 23EA63
Typical P7P55D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D PREMIUM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback