QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '21 at 14:19
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
QEMU Virtual version 2.5+
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 26.5
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 132
34% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 320
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 480GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 759 799 719 366 443 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 562
Write 420
Mixed 491
SusWrite 551
114% 506 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 9.2
32% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 209
152% 197 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 276
14% 276 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback