HP 700-010xt

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 700-010xt (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 151 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 488 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Device(1B0A 90C5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.06 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 8.3 6% 7.43 fps	MRender 7.5 Gravity 9 Splatting 7.5 6% 8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A 2TB 2,924 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 261 271 275 280 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 388 Write 393 Mixed 283 SusWrite 273 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 22.7 76% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 270 220% 315 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 117%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 925GB free Firmware: 0116 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 128 139 131 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 329 Write 238 Mixed 298 SusWrite 131 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 12 47% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 58.3 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 97.4 74% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: HP33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 33 34 34 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD Game Drive 5TB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4.5TB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 114 114 114 117 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 120 Write 107 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 112 140% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.8 277% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 66%
HP Photosmart Premi 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.3 5.2 4.5 5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.16% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.9 8% 6.28 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.16% Great: 8%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 96 100 99 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 99 Write 96.2 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 99.2 125% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 49%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 3GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 36 36 34 35 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 36 Write 34.2 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 34.9 44% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 4x8GB 1,895 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	48.9% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 14.6 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	40.1"	1280 720	SAM0B60 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-010xt Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP 700-010xt

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RTX 3050Nvidia $230Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	2x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 250GBSeagateBench 84%, 1,332 samples	5x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $190Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 4x8GBMicronBench 58%, 1,895 samples	3x
HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 2,689 samples	2x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 6,467 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $356

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16