PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160316 |
Uptime | 15.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '21 at 02:23 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
75.8%
Very good
|
77% 136 Pts
|
57% 454 Pts
|
36% 588 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
97.3%
Outstanding
|
99% 126 fps
|
94% 116 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 411 352 273 262 263 MB/s
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
89% 395 MB/s
|
144% 52.1 MB/s
|
255% 344 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
226GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 370 364 368 369 370 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
96% 426 MB/s
|
183% 63.4 MB/s
|
261% 350 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
449GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 65 66 56 52 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
41% 56.4 MB/s
|
85% 0.57 MB/s
|
|
![]() BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 320GB
173GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.3 MB/s
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
11% 8.05 MB/s
|
7% 0.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69%
Good
|
70% 24.6 GB/s
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
53% 76.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
71% | 18% | 119 | 251 | 179 | 144 | 24" | 1920 1080 | ACI24E1 VG248 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 603x |
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 471x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 467x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 568x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 404x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 241x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $400 |