ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '15 at 03:32
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 106 2-Core 212 72% 159 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 601 62% 502 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5435 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 10% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF36 360GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: LTRi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 158784 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 24288 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 31 100 85902032927 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 108 100 4333732404 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 15576 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 25 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 15576 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3453 (F9) Unknown 100 100 273	57.9% Above average	Read 485 Write 260 Mixed 342 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 14.6 64% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 96.5 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 39.2 40% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 33GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 22.4 Mixed 14.1 27% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.24 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.57 55% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,259x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	978x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	424x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	424x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	396x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	294x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	109x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	109x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	65x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	359x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	217x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	196x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback