Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AERO 17 XC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 17 XC  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 03:22
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 268
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 914
86% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 86D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 147
Parallax 8.2
6% 54 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR01TBTLCG-EAC-4 1TB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1558 1402 1434 1200 982 1013 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 747
Write 1,477
Mixed 1,112
SusWrite 1,265
262% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 36.9
112% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 227
250% 448 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 167%
Great: 325%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.M8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO329B
Typical GA-AERO 17 XC Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 17 XC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback