Asus EX-B250M-V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-B250M-V3  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 08:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$86
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 454
61% 455 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Nvidia(10DE 1099) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 10.8
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,291
Write 8,399
Mixed 7,563
1,738% 7,751 MB/s
4K Read 626
4K Write 420
4K Mixed 510
1,825% 519 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 739
552% 739 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
266GB free
Firmware: CV11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,822
Write 8,384
Mixed 7,529
5,712% 7,578 MB/s
4K Read 701
4K Write 442
4K Mixed 528
96,076% 557 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 692
6,675% 766 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16K2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELF071 DELL SE2216H
Typical EX-B250M-V3 Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-B250M-V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback