Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 22:52
Run Duration384 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 111
50% 80 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 315
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 133
Parallax 119
95% 123 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 104
Splatting 114
103% 129 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 222 210 208 195 198 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 453
Write 303
Mixed 287
SusWrite 208
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 39.6
131% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 301
228% 309 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
466GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 338 331 345 330 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 414
Mixed 353
SusWrite 330
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 45.4
146% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 346
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 338 332 345 330 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 403
Write 384
Mixed 284
SusWrite 330
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 35.6
125% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 279
229% 328 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
38GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 144 142 142 141 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 59.5
Write 57
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 141
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 84%
WDC WD20 PURZ-85GU6Y0 2TB
38GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 39 39 38 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 36.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 38.7
49% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 30.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 5R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 19% 57 104 1 60 23" 1920 1080 FUS0857 B23T-7 LED
History: Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 12: 1R 1G 4B | Score 35: 7R 0G 0B | Score 61: 8R 4G 9B | Score 33: 5R 1G 5B
Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback