Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$215
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 325
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,159
107% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,264
140% 2,264 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 241
Parallax 442
170% 297 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 155
Splatting 264
212% 261 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 168%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 1036 1126 1224 1131 1076 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,013
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,840
SusWrite 1,226
419% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 81.5
288% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 1,254
942% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 300%
Great: 347%
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 488 426 469 418 347 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 483
Mixed 345
SusWrite 422
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 50.6
184% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 245
203% 292 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
662GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 412 411 409 412 412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 424
Mixed 410
SusWrite 413
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 28.2
136% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 41
77% 153 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 97%
Jmicron Generic 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 184 177 184 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Very poor
Read 156
Write 127
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 183
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1
8% 4.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Rsh-339 ASM1153E 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 39.4
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
450% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$172
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 195 197 194 197 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 43.1
139% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 40.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 130%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 6R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 35% 46 329 266 144 31.5" 2560 1440 GSM772A LG QHD
History: Score 41: 3R 7G 5B | Score 46: 6R 3G 7B
Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback