MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 21:35
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 908
94% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 110
Parallax 114
100% 115 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 103
Splatting 94.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 254 248 243 239 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,423
Write 1461
Mixed 1035
SusWrite 302
288% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 78.3
269% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 993
729% 954 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 240%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
248GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 306 299 301 301 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 482
Mixed 344
SusWrite 308
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 43.8
161% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 230
196% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,464
Write 8,106
Mixed 7,123
1,624% 7,231 MB/s
4K Read 608
4K Write 347
4K Mixed 396
1,613% 450 MB/s
DQ Read 1,556
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,158
906% 1,260 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
478GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 107 108 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 106
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
568GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 117 114 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 87%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 67GB
61GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 8.7 13 14 7.5 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.11% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 8
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 9.9
16% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.9
100% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.11%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F55 C32JG5x
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $679
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback