Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 22:03
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 117
57% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 349
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 173 101 205 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 193
Write 33.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 130
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 10.6
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 13.3
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 105 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 105
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1TB free, PID ac20
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
40% Below average
Read 79.9
Write 109
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 111
131% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 160C0 V3 Series Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 8 60 0" 1280 720
Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback