Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '21 at 15:23
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59 6,408 User benchmarks, average bench 51% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 58 2-Core 108 47% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 204 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 104A) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.03 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 386 356 381 376 383 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 352 Write 383 Mixed 316 SusWrite 373 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 32.5 120% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 176 146% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 297GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 83 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 73.4 Write 80.7 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 84.2 52% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-1333 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 KHX1866C10D3/4G 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1866, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	19.5"	1280 720	DELD03B DELL E2014H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16