Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 12:23
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 758
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 147
Parallax 137
116% 142 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 145
Splatting 123
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 3.5 19 45 3.5 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47% Average
Read 438
Write 326
Mixed 310
SusWrite 44.2
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 18.9
73% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 33.1
43% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
242GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 114 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 403
Write 174
Mixed 234
SusWrite 130
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.2
44% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 97%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 80 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 69.9
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 83.4
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4B8G4J2400A16K2-ON 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 21% 24 109 5 60 24.1" 1920 1200 AOC246A 2460X
Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback