Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360N WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 761
84% 663 Pts
64-Core 775
48% 775 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1767 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 49.2
31% 40.7 fps
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 35.8
36% 42 fps
Poor: 23% Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36302029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 535 537 531 520 516 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,713
Write 566
Mixed 726
SusWrite 529
194% 884 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 55.3
216% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,164
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 675
551% 800 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 205%
Great: 339%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 118 120 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 117
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 29.8
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360N WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback