Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH77EB
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141015
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 05:57
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 516
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.7% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 73.2
61% 74.5 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 57.6
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 180GB-$134
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 124 136 128 139 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 362
Write 84.4
Mixed 214
SusWrite 132
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 25.2
77% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 198
154% 212 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 86%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: MVT04L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 208 231 235 247 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 249
Write 238
Mixed 230
SusWrite 221
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 31.1
98% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M0 033AE352 M1 17461AFC 17661B07 M1 1364A0E8 16GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 5R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 26% 34 334 265 60 23" 1920 1080 DEL409A DELL P2314H
History: Score 21: 2R 2G 5B | Score 40: 8R 0G 0B | Score 37: 5R 4G 0B
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback