Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '21 at 00:22
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 709
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Lighting 93.7
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 78.6
76% 85.9 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 72.1
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 469 416 264 9.9 8.4 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 147
Write 58.4
Mixed 28
SusWrite 271
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 15.8
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 219
109% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 96%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
236GB free
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 465 430 459 454 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 410
Mixed 363
SusWrite 454
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 38.6
146% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 204
179% 263 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
TONPHA USB 2.0 Classic 32GB
29GB free, PID 1128
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.49% Terrible
Read 16
Write 12.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 11.3
17% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH64AA# 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 9R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 20% 82 261 185 60 72.3" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 44: 6R 3G 5B | Score 47: 7R 4G 0B | Score 64: 9R 6G 1B
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $432
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback