Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2779
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101213
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 00:29
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$99 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 54 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 89.3 41% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 76.8 8-Core 152 14% 115 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.30 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 10 10% 12.1 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 11.7 Splatting 12.4 9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI MegaSR 119GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 23 25 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.1% Above average	Read 161 Write 24.9 Mixed 36.4 SusWrite 23.8 45% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 53%
Samsung G2 Portable 320GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 132GB free, PID 6032 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 25 26 26 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 17.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 24.8 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	55%	33	87	24	60	18.5"	1366 768	PHLC0CD PHL 193V5

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM