Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121024
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 13:19
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 464 50% 395 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gainward(10B0 17C8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.6% Very good	Lighting 88.4 Reflection 103 Parallax 91.6 72% 94.3 fps	MRender 91.5 Gravity 88.6 Splatting 81.1 71% 87.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 178 266 322 341 334 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 286 Write 269 Mixed 260 SusWrite 276 62% 273 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 20.8 79% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 81.5 92% 168 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 224GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 291 112 81 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 472 Write 382 Mixed 333 SusWrite 153 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 22.8 82% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 88.9 94% 166 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 121%
Kingrlch 128GB 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 29GB free Firmware: S0221A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 56 63 62 62 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	Read 255 Write 190 Mixed 128 SusWrite 70.9 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 12.7 69% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 26.1 43% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 156 168 169 168 168 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 150 Write 57.9 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 162 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 203GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 131 126 124 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 144 Write 105 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 125 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 113%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 14.5 20% 15 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 8%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 81GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 26 25 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 21.2 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 23.8 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB 6,401 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 15.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	144	27"	1280 720	SAM0E41 C27FG7x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	486x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	431x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	272x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	98x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	91x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	88x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	35x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	47x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $786

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16