Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130927
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 17:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 169
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 523
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 405 448 441 409 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 442
Mixed 434
SusWrite 420
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 30.5
139% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 291
234% 327 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
42GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 146 160 177 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 161
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 149
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 107%
Generic- SD/MMC 125GB
116GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 8.7 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 11
12% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback