IT NH50_70RH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIT NH50_70RH  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH50_70RH
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 649
69% 550 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8552) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 9.6
5% 18.3 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FNX240MORM 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 147 62 33 67 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 316
Write 400
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 90.5
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.6
33% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 94.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
31% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 68: 8R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
68% 27% 82 240 150 144 15.5" 1536 864 LGD05E8
History: Score 51: 7R 5G 1B | Score 68: 8R 7G 7B
Typical NH50_70RH Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: IT NH50_70RH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback