Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 04:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 187
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 514
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 51.5
32% 42.2 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 49
Splatting 38.8
38% 47 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180509a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 83 87 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 330
Write 91.4
Mixed 134
SusWrite 83.3
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 23.1
81% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 115
85% 113 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 120 119 119 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 116
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 68%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 256GB
15GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 21 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 19.8
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 20.1" 1280 720 ACRAD64 AL2016W
Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback