Asrock 880GMH/U3S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 880GMH/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 08:26
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 86.6
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 98.8
51% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 184
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 1384) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 22.7
20% 21.6 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 14.6
16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 119
Mixed 111
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 24.6
22% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
82GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 92 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 80.4
Write 78.4
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 90.4
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
91GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 32 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 34.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 32
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
159% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 64%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
30GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 49%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
40GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 99 109 109 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 85.4
Mixed 84
SusWrite 99.4
116% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 49%
PHD 2.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
87GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 21.4
Write 17.9
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 24.1
29% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ783F BenQ G2420HD
Typical 880GMH/U3S3 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback