Today's hottest deals

Asus S300CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus S300CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S300CA
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '17 at 09:57
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 91.5
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 114
59% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 11AD) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 2.59
3% 3.75 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.09
4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 74.8
Write 76.2
Mixed 74.8
57% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.16
36% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ4208EFDBG-GNL-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S300CA Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus S300CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback