Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110-D3A
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 199
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 381
49% 372 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.2% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 74.7
62% 76.2 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 60
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 255 249 252 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 381
Write 329
Mixed 222
SusWrite 250
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 34.2
136% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 200
169% 249 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
456GB free
Firmware: 05.04C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 82 81 84 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 83.1
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 81.8
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 18.4" 1280 720 GSM4BAD W1943
Typical GA-H110-D3A-CF Builds (Compare 1,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110-D3A-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback