Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 87
2-Core 180
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 540
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 74.9
57% 72.8 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 65.9
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 302
Write 196
Mixed 233
SusWrite 121
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 61.8
DQ Mixed 41.8
33% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
180GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 174 175 174 175 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.8% Average
Read 199
Write 217
Mixed 181
SusWrite 175
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 25.5
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 37.3
34% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 107%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
156GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 109 112 108 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 110
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 86 89 87 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 86.2
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 105 105 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 112
Write 99.9
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 103
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
144GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 87 86 88 87 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 100
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 86.2
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 70%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
864GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 75.4
Write 73.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 106
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 HWP2941 HP 2711
Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback