PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus BM6835_BM6635_BP6335 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK BM6835_BM6635_BP6335 |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140219 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '21 at 15:16 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 88 82 111 107 99 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 154 162 167 145 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Generic Mass-Storage 256GB
233GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 10 MB/s
|
4.42%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 24x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 17x |
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $125 |