Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 844
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,090
67% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.2% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 126
Parallax 117
91% 118 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 124
Splatting 108
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1268 1331 1427 1344 1355 953 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,515
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 1,280
334% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 58.8
195% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,048
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 311
299% 499 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 240%
Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 183 138 112 94 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 480
Write 416
Mixed 384
SusWrite 163
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 43.1
144% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 176
129% 171 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
671GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 108 115 110 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 84.6
Write 101
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 110
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
189% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 90%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
134GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 133 123 125 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 181
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 138
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
Intenso Rainbow Line 8GB
3GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.8 10 9.4 9.5 9.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 9.4
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.6
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.3
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 75: 8R 8G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
75% 24% 112 108 7 144 27" 2560 1440 SAM0FDB C27JG5x
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback