PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7641 |
Motherboard | MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) (all builds) |
Memory | 7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.7 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121214 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 12 '21 at 07:50 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$261
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 88 57 85 91 88 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 137 138 137 137 MB/s
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
185GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99P5474-055.A00LF 8GB
1704, 1704 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 106x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 40x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 33x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $174 |