Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 903
93% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 212
Parallax 202
190% 216 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1385 1479 1533 1554 1548 1217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 1,533
Mixed 1,330
SusWrite 1,453
380% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 88.8
295% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 593
532% 799 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 321%
Great: 383%
Kingston SNVS2000GB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1638 1682 1698 1698 1696 1699 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1668
Mixed 992
SusWrite 1685
321% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 24.4
185% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 517
503% 790 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 250%
Great: 242%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
5TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 171 176 177 177 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 179 184 196 196 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 119
Write 159
Mixed 79
SusWrite 185
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
670GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 42 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 39.3
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 40.4
51% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 24.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 9R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 62% 26 109 6 60 27" 2560 1440 DELA0D1 Dell S2716DG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback