Intel NUC7i7BNB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel NUC7i7BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i7BNB  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7567U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 192
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 301
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 11.1
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.7
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 444
Mixed 380
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 33.5
119% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 142
132% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
723GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 106 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 55
SusWrite 104
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 25.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 66 4 30 31.5" 1280 720 GSM772E U32R59x
Typical NUC7i7BNB Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i7BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback