Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,209
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,889
179% 2,889 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 199
108% 158 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 136
Splatting 96.2
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1644 1666 1668 1614 1445 1468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,682
Write 2,343
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,584
474% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 85.5
280% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 530
507% 824 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 334%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
303GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,718
Write 5,209
Mixed 5,831
1,317% 5,919 MB/s
4K Read 295
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 99.1
649% 178 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 821
675% 985 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
380GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 460 461 462 462 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 460
Mixed 413
SusWrite 462
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 52.5
172% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 220
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUH 721212ALE600 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: LEGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 210 216 211 219 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 184
Mixed 134
SusWrite 215
135% 183 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.7
566% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$209
2TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 116 111 116 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 113
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 116
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.5
454% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 44.4
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 123%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback