Asus H110M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-F (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 203 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 173 41% 272 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 39 Parallax 36.8 28% 36.9 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 26.4 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 17 24 66 5 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23% Poor	Read 350 Write 34.4 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 24.1 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 6.6 24% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 838GB free Firmware: CC57 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 197 207 206 209 208 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 120 Mixed 77 SusWrite 205 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 18.2 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	144	24"	1280 720	BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-F Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-F

CPU
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	41x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	39x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	35x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x
256GB SSD 256GBXraydiskBench 85%, 422 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
CM4X8GF2400C16K2 1x8GBCorsairBench 41%, 108 samples	9x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GBTeamBench 41%, 3,973 samples	7x
MLVD48192MLD-24 1x8GBUnknownBench 39%, 15 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16