HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171005
Uptime46 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 16:01
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 213
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 628
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
HP(103C 802F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000H1 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 1161 1190 1151 1175 1110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 1,335
Mixed 714
SusWrite 1,182
260% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 57.4
195% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,253
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,132
853% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 239%
Great: 287%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-75PVMT0 250GB
131GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 35 35 39 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 12
Write 36.1
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 34.9
39% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 37%
USB DISK 3.0 126GB
72GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 0.5 2.2 4.6 0 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 2.3
5% 4.92 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 HWP3264 HP E240
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback