Lenovo 20ASA01900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20ASA01900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ASA01900
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 151
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 355
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 501E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7.7
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.6
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian N400 120GB
104GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 127 53 52 52 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 461
Write 400
Mixed 372
SusWrite 104
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 1.2
58% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 1.1
44% 106 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic 250GB
133GB free (System drive), PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 344 352 332 328 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 314
Write 310
Mixed 306
SusWrite 335
435% 316 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 21.1
1,632% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 25.5
1,914% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 199%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 8% 25 19 4 60 14" 1600 900 LEN40A1
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback