Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 908
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2,437
151% 2,437 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 247
Parallax 308
211% 272 fps
MRender 321
Gravity 238
Splatting 172
191% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 898 871 872 875 880 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,473
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 908
374% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 67.3
223% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 515
415% 590 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 252%
Great: 372%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
6.5TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 156 163 168 169 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 216 218 220 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
6TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 200 202 205 204 204 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 10%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 2638
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 108
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%
Innostor Ext. HDD 960GB
632GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 225 224 224 224 224 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
163% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 222
Mixed 219
SusWrite 225
308% 227 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 11.7
1,286% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 33.6
DQ Mixed 13.7
1,669% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 163%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 49.6
148% 51.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 130%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 7R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 33% 42 307 246 60 34.1" 2752 1152 DELA0AA DELL U3415W
History: Score 27: 4R 1G 4B | Score 54: 7R 6G 1B
Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback