Today's hottest deals

Asus B85M-E/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-E/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 596
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 3061) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 27
Parallax 31
18% 26.7 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 24.8
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$79
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 233
Write 150
Mixed 205
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40
150% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 162
119% 156 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
614GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 187 186 186 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 184
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
85GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 146 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 146
Write 143
Mixed 100
SusWrite 146
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
13GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.2 5.2 4.8 4.5 5.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 39.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 5.2
14% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E/BR Builds (Compare 642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback